Replace IssueLabelsOption with []int64 #387

Closed
6543 wants to merge 2 commits from 6543:rm-IssueLabelsOption_366 into main
Owner

close #366

close #366
6543 added this to the v0.13.0 milestone 2020-07-27 14:22:10 +00:00
6543 added the
kind/breaking
kind/enhancement
labels 2020-07-27 14:22:10 +00:00
6543 added 2 commits 2020-07-27 14:22:13 +00:00
add docu
All checks were successful
continuous-integration/drone/pr Build is passing
03e5347cfe
6543 added the
status/needs-reviews
label 2020-07-27 14:22:51 +00:00
Owner

I don't think expose the label's id is a good idea. maybe we should give all the label names.

I don't think expose the label's id is a good idea. maybe we should give all the label names.
Author
Owner

@lunny at the moment the api works that way

this only makes functions easyer to call but thats it

if we invent api v2 we can have eyes on not exposing IDs

@lunny at the moment the api works that way this only makes functions easyer to call but thats it if we invent api v2 we can have eyes on not exposing IDs
Owner

And why we need the change? A struct contains ids will be easier to add extra params in future?

And why we need the change? A struct contains ids will be easier to add extra params in future?
Author
Owner

it's more or less beauty correctio and extra params I think wont be added

I'll close it for now

it's more or less beauty correctio and extra params I think wont be added I'll close it for now
6543 closed this pull request 2020-07-30 12:42:33 +00:00
6543 removed this from the v0.13.0 milestone 2020-07-30 12:43:11 +00:00
6543 removed the
status/needs-reviews
label 2020-07-30 12:43:22 +00:00
6543 deleted branch rm-IssueLabelsOption_366 2020-07-30 12:43:40 +00:00
Some checks are pending
continuous-integration/drone/pr Build is passing
testing / testing*
Required

Pull request closed

Sign in to join this conversation.
No description provided.