#119 App access tokens

Stängd
öppnade 1 månad sedan av 6543 · 5 kommentarer
6543 kommenterad 1 månad sedan

If you log on and off multible times, for example to switch betwen instances or for testing …

each logon a new token is created instead of using the old one or delete the old one …

If you log on and off multible times, for example to switch betwen instances or for testing ... each logon a new token is created instead of using the old one or delete the old one ... ![](https://cloud.obermui.de/apps/gallery/preview.public/1475266?width=2000&height=2000&c=69d4f04a14d835cb06a5e59abd6fcf13&requesttoken=4d%2B4vsboMCbjaZPhXl35u%2FcKrtug7DhRlf1%2FzM9j7%2BU%3D%3AqrjZ%2Bo6cZmW7EfatLTqPg7ln4bzapGIJxYcdnuQHl4A%3D&token=dDTcCcrJfGy3KcK)
mmarif kommenterad 1 månad sedan
Ägare

Each login will not create new token but each new installation will.

Also there are times when the app can be used in multiple devices, so it’s risky to delete other tokens.

But I am open to ideas on this.

Each login will not create new token but each new installation will. Also there are times when the app can be used in multiple devices, so it's risky to delete other tokens. But I am open to ideas on this.
6543 added the
Discussion
label 1 månad sedan
6543 added the
Priority-low
label 1 månad sedan
6543 kommenterad 1 månad sedan
Skapare

I’ll leave it for later when multi instance function is implemented we can look at this again?

I'll leave it for later when multi instance function is implemented we can look at this again?
mmarif kommenterad 1 månad sedan
Ägare

Yes, we can leave it for later.

Actually before implementing this, I thought many times and considered many scenarios for deleting tokens. But then I dropped that idea for many other reasons(like one above).

Yes, we can leave it for later. Actually before implementing this, I thought many times and considered many scenarios for deleting tokens. But then I dropped that idea for many other reasons(like one above).
mmarif changed title from app tocken mess to App access tokens 1 månad sedan
mmarif removed the
Discussion
label 2 veckor sedan
mmarif removed the
Priority-low
label 2 veckor sedan
mmarif added the
Refactor
label 2 veckor sedan
mmarif kommenterad 2 veckor sedan
Ägare

It’s time to revisit this issue after merging #179 .

I feel a clean refactor is needed to reduce the tokens created.

It's time to revisit this issue after merging #179 . I feel a clean refactor is needed to reduce the tokens created.
mmarif lade till denna till milstolpe 2.3.0 1 vecka sedan
mmarif tilldelade denna till sig själv 5 dagar sedan
mmarif kommenterad 4 dagar sedan
Ägare

Closed via #202

Closed via #202
Logga in för att delta i denna konversation.
Ingen Milsten
No Assignees
2 Deltagare
Förfallodatum

Inget förfallodatum satt.

Beroenden

This issue currently doesn't have any dependencies.

Laddar…
Avbryt
Spara
Det finns inget innehåll än.