show the same fields when editing issues #1345
Labels
No labels
⌚ Major-release
⌚ Minor-release
⚔️ Wontfix
⚙️ CI
⛏️ Breaking
✨ Duplicate
❌ Invalid
❓ Question
❤️ Support
➡️ Frontport
➡️ Needs-frontport
🔙 Backport
💭 Brainstorming
🐛 Bug
🔭 Cannot-reproduce
🧺 Cleanup
🧾 Confirmed
💬 Discussion
📄 Documentation
🎯 Enhancement
🩹 External-dependecy
📱 F-droid
🎉 Feature
👋 Good-first-issue
🤾 Google-play
🔙 Has-backport
🚀 Improvement
🚨 Investigate
🌠 Long-term
🔙 Needs-backport
🧺 Needs-cleanup
📡 Needs-feedback
📈 Performance
📌 Priority-critical
📌 Priority-high
📍 Priority-low
📍 Priority-medium
🥑 Ready
🪒 Refactor
🔙 Regression
📸 Release
🔒 Security
💡 Suggestion
🧪 Testing
🌐 Translation
💻 UI/UX
🪜 Upstream
🟦 Website
🙇♂️ Needs-help
🛰️ API-dependency
🛡️ Blocked
🏗️ Build
🗒️ Changelog
🗄️ Repository
🗓️ Summary
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: gitnex/GitNex#1345
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
when creating new issues, you can select labels and assignees from the fields below. but when editing an issies, those fields are there no longer available, you need to configure this directly from the three dots menu. This is an inconsistent design, the edit page should be usable quite similar to the create page
I would not call this UI inconsistency because a new issue does not have any sheets, while a single issue/pull request has many actions to perform.
But your point, to some degree, is valid and makes sense.
For now, I will leave this open and let other users chime in and have their say (if anyone would like to). Who knows, we can change this in future to what you suggested.