Change "filter" to "search" #176

New Issue

Closed

opened 2020-06-03 21:53:34 +00:00 by 6543 · 6 comments

6543 commented

2020-06-03 21:53:34 +00:00

Member

Created By: @PopeRigby

I think using "Filter" is a bit too ambiguous. It usually implies that you'll be able to filter by something like the number of comments, for example. I think it should be changed to say "Search" and have its icon changed to a magnifying glass, in all places where the filter shows up.

Created By: @PopeRigby I think using "Filter" is a bit too ambiguous. It usually implies that you'll be able to filter by something like the number of comments, for example. I think it should be changed to say "Search" and have its icon changed to a magnifying glass, in all places where the filter shows up.

6543 added this to the 2.3.0 milestone 2020-06-03 21:53:34 +00:00

6543 added the

🎯 Enhancement

💻 UI/UX

labels 2020-06-03 21:53:34 +00:00

6543 closed this issue

2020-06-03 21:53:34 +00:00

mmarif commented

2020-06-03 21:54:14 +00:00

Owner

I am open to discussion on this. It was like that before.

See https://gitea.com/gitnex/GitNex/issues/67

I am open to discussion on this. It was like that before. See https://gitea.com/gitnex/GitNex/issues/67

6543 commented

2020-06-03 21:54:35 +00:00

Author

Member

Created By: @PopeRigby

Filter is usually used for sorting or excluding certain results, so calling this feature filter is confusing.

It makes perfect sense to just be searching where you're currently located.

Created By: @PopeRigby Filter is usually used for sorting or excluding certain results, so calling this feature filter is confusing. It makes perfect sense to just be searching where you're currently located.

mmarif commented

2020-06-03 21:54:55 +00:00

Owner

I myself prefer search keyword with magnifying glass and your explanation makes sense.

@6543 what you think?

I myself prefer search keyword with magnifying glass and your explanation makes sense. @6543 what you think?

6543 commented

2020-06-03 21:55:15 +00:00

Author

Member

@mmarif i dont mind ... like the feature

but the arguent is good ... filter usualy take arguments "user:6543 lable:xy" and so on