More Specific token name #179
Labels
No Label
⌚ Major-release
⌚ Minor-release
⚔️ Wontfix
⚙️ CI
⛏️ Breaking
✨ Duplicate
❌ Invalid
❓ Question
❤️ Support
➡️ Frontport
➡️ Needs-frontport
🔙 Backport
💭 Brainstorming
🐛 Bug
🔭 Cannot-reproduce
🧺 Cleanup
🧾 Confirmed
💬 Discussion
📄 Documentation
🎯 Enhancement
🩹 External-dependecy
📱 F-droid
🎉 Feature
👋 Good-first-issue
🤾 Google-play
🔙 Has-backport
🚀 Improvement
🚨 Investigate
🌠 Long-term
🔙 Needs-backport
🧺 Needs-cleanup
📡 Needs-feedback
📈 Performance
📌 Priority-critical
📌 Priority-high
📍 Priority-low
📍 Priority-medium
🥑 Ready
🪒 Refactor
🔙 Regression
📸 Release
🔒 Security
💡 Suggestion
🧪 Testing
🌐 Translation
💻 UI/UX
🪜 Upstream
🟦 Website
🙇♂️ Needs-help
🛰️ API-dependency
🛡️ Blocked
🏗️ Build
🗒️ Changelog
🗄️ Repository
🗓️ Summary
No Milestone
No project
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: gitnex/GitNex#179
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
if https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/7135 is merged ... GitNex will have problem with mulit device support!
-> we sould use token-name based on "GitNex-" or something like that ...
Thanks for the heads up on this.
How about update/refresh the token instead of straight throwing an error?, From the code it looks like it will not allow you to create or update token with the same name anymore.
Update token is more relevant in this case.
Or maybe I am wrong as the token does not expire.
Yes, need to think about it.
I'll take a look at this - doesn't sound time consuming ...
I made a draft PR #184
Close via #184