Feature Request: multiple instances/accounts #28

Closed
opened 2020-06-03 13:38:10 +00:00 by 6543 · 9 comments
Member

If you have your own instance and another one, it would be nice to have one not two apps for it.

If you have your own instance and another one, it would be nice to have one not two apps for it.
6543 added this to the 3.1.0 milestone 2020-06-03 13:38:10 +00:00
6543 added the
🎉 Feature
Major-release
labels 2020-06-03 13:38:10 +00:00
Owner

By instances i guess you mean multiple accounts on the same instance or diff instances.

Its on the cards in the future. I am going to introduce db, which needs a bit of work to rewrite some of the current code which use shared preferences for account related stuff.

By instances i guess you mean multiple accounts on the same instance or diff instances. Its on the cards in the future. I am going to introduce db, which needs a bit of work to rewrite some of the current code which use shared preferences for account related stuff.
Author
Member

Created By: @strk

Both diff instances and diff accounts on same instance would be useful

Created By: @strk Both diff instances and diff accounts on same instance would be useful
Author
Member

@mmarif

i have my own gitea instance and also an acoutn on gitea.com ...
so both :D

@strk thanks to remind me to answer this issue 😅

@mmarif i have my own gitea instance and also an acoutn on gitea.com ... so both :D @strk thanks to remind me to answer this issue 😅
Owner

I agree with both implementations. Multiple accounts on same instance and multiple accounts on multiple instances.

I agree with both implementations. Multiple accounts on same instance and multiple accounts on multiple instances.
Author
Member

Created By: @fazlerabbi37

Hi @mmarif, any update regarding this? This would be really handy for me with 4 Gitea instances and accounts.

Created By: @fazlerabbi37 Hi @mmarif, any update regarding this? This would be really handy for me with 4 Gitea instances and accounts.
Author
Member

I would say first make basic usage of RoomDB in 3.0.0 and then add more functions in with 3.1.0 - but we can move this to 3.0.0 if all goes well I would say?

I would say first make basic usage of RoomDB in 3.0.0 and then add more functions in with 3.1.0 - but we can move this to 3.0.0 if all goes well I would say?
Author
Member

Created By: @fazlerabbi37

but we can move this to 3.0.0 if all goes well I would say?

If possible that would be a real life saver for me. 😄

Created By: @fazlerabbi37 > but we can move this to 3.0.0 if all goes well I would say? If possible that would be a real life saver for me. :smile:
Owner

Hi @fazlerabbi37, as @6543 mentioned it is still wip.

This PR #139 will add the database part including drafts for comments. We will work on multi account setup as beta after that for 3.0.0 release.

So yes it is on the cards for 3.0.0 release but as beta. Which means it will work but may have rough edges which we will iron out in the next releases. The reason is it need alot of code refactor.

Finger crossed for this feature. One of the most demanded one. 😄

Hi @fazlerabbi37, as @6543 mentioned it is still wip. This PR #139 will add the database part including drafts for comments. We will work on multi account setup as beta after that for 3.0.0 release. So yes it is on the cards for 3.0.0 release but as beta. Which means it will work but may have rough edges which we will iron out in the next releases. The reason is it need alot of code refactor. Finger crossed for this feature. One of the most demanded one. :smile:
Author
Member

Created By: @fazlerabbi37

@mmarif Thanks for the reply! Really looking forward to this feature.

Created By: @fazlerabbi37 @mmarif Thanks for the reply! Really looking forward to this feature.
mmarif self-assigned this 2020-07-26 09:08:08 +00:00
6543 closed this issue 2020-08-04 20:50:06 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: gitnex/GitNex#28
No description provided.