Feature Request: multiple instances/accounts #28
Labels
No Label
⌚ Major-release
⌚ Minor-release
⚔️ Wontfix
⚙️ CI
⛏️ Breaking
✨ Duplicate
❌ Invalid
❓ Question
❤️ Support
➡️ Frontport
➡️ Needs-frontport
🔙 Backport
💭 Brainstorming
🐛 Bug
🔭 Cannot-reproduce
🧺 Cleanup
🧾 Confirmed
💬 Discussion
📄 Documentation
🎯 Enhancement
🩹 External-dependecy
📱 F-droid
🎉 Feature
👋 Good-first-issue
🤾 Google-play
🔙 Has-backport
🚀 Improvement
🚨 Investigate
🌠 Long-term
🔙 Needs-backport
🧺 Needs-cleanup
📡 Needs-feedback
📈 Performance
📌 Priority-critical
📌 Priority-high
📍 Priority-low
📍 Priority-medium
🥑 Ready
🪒 Refactor
🔙 Regression
📸 Release
🔒 Security
💡 Suggestion
🧪 Testing
🌐 Translation
💻 UI/UX
🪜 Upstream
🟦 Website
🙇♂️ Needs-help
🛰️ API-dependency
🛡️ Blocked
🏗️ Build
🗒️ Changelog
🗄️ Repository
🗓️ Summary
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: gitnex/GitNex#28
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
If you have your own instance and another one, it would be nice to have one not two apps for it.
By instances i guess you mean multiple accounts on the same instance or diff instances.
Its on the cards in the future. I am going to introduce db, which needs a bit of work to rewrite some of the current code which use shared preferences for account related stuff.
Created By: @strk
Both diff instances and diff accounts on same instance would be useful
@mmarif
i have my own gitea instance and also an acoutn on gitea.com ...
so both :D
@strk thanks to remind me to answer this issue 😅
I agree with both implementations. Multiple accounts on same instance and multiple accounts on multiple instances.
Created By: @fazlerabbi37
Hi @mmarif, any update regarding this? This would be really handy for me with 4 Gitea instances and accounts.
I would say first make basic usage of RoomDB in 3.0.0 and then add more functions in with 3.1.0 - but we can move this to 3.0.0 if all goes well I would say?
Created By: @fazlerabbi37
If possible that would be a real life saver for me. 😄
Hi @fazlerabbi37, as @6543 mentioned it is still wip.
This PR #139 will add the database part including drafts for comments. We will work on multi account setup as beta after that for 3.0.0 release.
So yes it is on the cards for 3.0.0 release but as beta. Which means it will work but may have rough edges which we will iron out in the next releases. The reason is it need alot of code refactor.
Finger crossed for this feature. One of the most demanded one. 😄
Created By: @fazlerabbi37
@mmarif Thanks for the reply! Really looking forward to this feature.