Stop packaging node_modules in release tarballs #15273
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
backport/done
backport/v1.0
backport/v1.1
backport/v1.10
backport/v1.11
backport/v1.12
backport/v1.13
backport/v1.14
backport/v1.15
backport/v1.2
backport/v1.3
backport/v1.4
backport/v1.5
backport/v1.6
backport/v1.7
backport/v1.8
backport/v1.9
bounty
changelog
dependencies
frontport/done
frontport/main
good first issue
Hacktoberfest
hacktoberfest-accepted
in progress
kind/api
kind/breaking
kind/bug
kind/build
kind/deployment
kind/deprecated
kind/docs
kind/enhancement
kind/feature
kind/lint
kind/misc
kind/moderation
kind/package
kind/proposal
kind/question
kind/refactor
kind/regression
kind/security
kind/summary
kind/testing
kind/translation
kind/ui
kind/upstream-related
kind/usability
kind/ux
lgtm/done
lgtm/need 1
lgtm/need 2
performance/bigrepo
performance/cpu
performance/memory
performance/speed
priority/critical
priority/low
priority/maybe
priority/medium
proposal/rejected
reviewed/confirmed
reviewed/duplicate
reviewed/fixed
reviewed/invalid
reviewed/not-a-bug
reviewed/wontfix
skip-changelog
stale
status/blocked
status/needs-feedback
status/wip
theme/2fa
theme/authentication
theme/avatar
theme/backup-restore
theme/docker
theme/federation
theme/issues
theme/kanban
theme/markdown
theme/migration
theme/mobile
theme/pr
theme/signing
theme/sqlite
theme/timetracker
theme/webhook
theme/wiki
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
2 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: lunny/gitea#15273
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "no-tar-rebuilds"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/14578
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/15256
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/15262
Ugh, GitHub converts between tabs and spaces automatically in commit diff view, but doesn't seem to touch the lines added in suggestion...
Is this related to a difference in the exclude syntax? The current syntax produces similar sized tarballs for me, using
tar (GNU tar) 1.34
andbsdtar 3.3.2
, so I'm not sure it's necessary.That's because
node_modules
isn't included anymore, so all thosedist
subfolders living there are also spared in both cases. If any folder gets nameddist
in the future they will be excluded bybsdtar
but included by GNU tar. This discovery was the origin of all hassles aroundbsdtar
...Thanks, I'll add a comment why its necessary.
I guess we can put even more such folders that may be present in a development setup using the default paths, like
indexers
andqueues
directories. Thought it's really a non-issue because CI builds from a clean slate anyways.