Fix race in log #16490
Labels
No Label
backport/done
backport/v1.0
backport/v1.1
backport/v1.10
backport/v1.11
backport/v1.12
backport/v1.13
backport/v1.14
backport/v1.15
backport/v1.2
backport/v1.3
backport/v1.4
backport/v1.5
backport/v1.6
backport/v1.7
backport/v1.8
backport/v1.9
bounty
changelog
dependencies
frontport/done
frontport/main
good first issue
Hacktoberfest
hacktoberfest-accepted
in progress
kind/api
kind/breaking
kind/bug
kind/build
kind/deployment
kind/deprecated
kind/docs
kind/enhancement
kind/feature
kind/lint
kind/misc
kind/moderation
kind/package
kind/proposal
kind/question
kind/refactor
kind/regression
kind/security
kind/summary
kind/testing
kind/translation
kind/ui
kind/upstream-related
kind/usability
kind/ux
lgtm/done
lgtm/need 1
lgtm/need 2
performance/bigrepo
performance/cpu
performance/memory
performance/speed
priority/critical
priority/low
priority/maybe
priority/medium
proposal/rejected
reviewed/confirmed
reviewed/duplicate
reviewed/fixed
reviewed/invalid
reviewed/not-a-bug
reviewed/wontfix
skip-changelog
stale
status/blocked
status/needs-feedback
status/wip
theme/2fa
theme/authentication
theme/avatar
theme/backup-restore
theme/docker
theme/federation
theme/issues
theme/kanban
theme/markdown
theme/migration
theme/mobile
theme/pr
theme/signing
theme/sqlite
theme/timetracker
theme/webhook
theme/wiki
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
2 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: lunny/gitea#16490
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "fix-race-in-log"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
A race has been detected in #1441 relating to getting log levels.
This PR protects the GetLevel and GetStacktraceLevel calls with a mutex.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton art27@cantab.net
imho
mutex
should beRWMutex
and Get methods useRLock
andRUnlock
The RWmutex requires two calls to lock and unlock and would be slower.
This is simply a lock around a single value. If performance were really an issue an
atomic.Load*
atomic.Store*
might be quicker but a RWMutex isn't going to improve this.What do you mean two calls? It requires same number of calls but state read only calls is not locking each other
There was no need to rename variable but otherwise lgtm