Add link to try.gitea.io #17

Closed
strk wants to merge 4 commits from unknown repository into main
strk commented 2016-12-14 14:05:12 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

.. also mention planned self-hosting and add link to download area

.. also mention planned self-hosting and add link to download area

LGTM

LGTM
tboerger commented 2016-12-14 15:24:21 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Generally I prefer lesser new lines as all the single sentences will be transferred to separate paragraphs.

Generally I prefer lesser new lines as all the single sentences will be transferred to separate paragraphs.
strk commented 2016-12-14 15:26:40 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Given the amount of current content, it isn't bad to have more paragraphs..

Given the amount of current content, it isn't bad to have more paragraphs..
tboerger commented 2016-12-14 16:15:45 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Instead of stretching simple phrases we want things like screenshots.

Instead of stretching simple phrases we want things like screenshots.
strk commented 2016-12-14 16:44:44 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I think we can do better incrementally, how about merging this and
sending a new PR for next iteration ?

I think we can do better incrementally, how about merging this and sending a new PR for next iteration ?
bkcsoft commented 2016-12-19 17:46:19 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I would flip the 2 lower around and then put them in the same paragraph.

I would flip the 2 lower around and then put them in the same paragraph.
tboerger commented 2016-12-19 18:43:49 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

👎 stop the line wrapping.

:-1: stop the line wrapping.
strk commented 2016-12-19 18:49:41 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

How do line wrapping hurt ?
What does your -1 mean in terms of acceptability of this PR ?
The CONTRIBUTING.md file doesn't mention veto powers nor does
go into details of acceptance/rejection (it probably should)

How do line wrapping hurt ? What does your -1 mean in terms of acceptability of this PR ? The CONTRIBUTING.md file doesn't mention veto powers nor does go into details of acceptance/rejection (it probably should)

All are right except line wrapping. It will break the UI on mobile or other small screen devices.

All are right except line wrapping. It will break the UI on mobile or other small screen devices.
strk commented 2016-12-20 09:46:39 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 05:12:51PM -0800, Lunny Xiao wrote:

All are right except line wrapping. It will break the UI on mobile or other small screen devices.

Single linebreaks in markdown have no structural meaning and should
thus not change the rendered output in any way. Do you have proof of
your statement about breaking on mobile UI and small screen devices ?

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 05:12:51PM -0800, Lunny Xiao wrote: > All are right except line wrapping. It will break the UI on mobile or other small screen devices. Single linebreaks in markdown have no structural meaning and should thus not change the rendered output in any way. Do you have proof of your statement about breaking on mobile UI and small screen devices ?
tboerger commented 2016-12-20 17:26:24 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Just revert the line breaks to match the style of ALL other markdown documents. Without this revert I'm against this pr.

Just revert the line breaks to match the style of ALL other markdown documents. Without this revert I'm against this pr.
strk commented 2016-12-24 14:18:26 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Not needed anymore now, there's a big green TRY button now..

Not needed anymore now, there's a big green TRY button now..
This repo is archived. You cannot comment on pull requests.
No description provided.