Use custom search for each filter type in dashboard #2343
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
backport/done
backport/v1.0
backport/v1.1
backport/v1.10
backport/v1.11
backport/v1.12
backport/v1.13
backport/v1.14
backport/v1.15
backport/v1.2
backport/v1.3
backport/v1.4
backport/v1.5
backport/v1.6
backport/v1.7
backport/v1.8
backport/v1.9
bounty
changelog
dependencies
frontport/done
frontport/main
good first issue
Hacktoberfest
hacktoberfest-accepted
in progress
kind/api
kind/breaking
kind/bug
kind/build
kind/deployment
kind/deprecated
kind/docs
kind/enhancement
kind/feature
kind/lint
kind/misc
kind/moderation
kind/package
kind/proposal
kind/question
kind/refactor
kind/regression
kind/security
kind/summary
kind/testing
kind/translation
kind/ui
kind/upstream-related
kind/usability
kind/ux
lgtm/done
lgtm/need 1
lgtm/need 2
performance/bigrepo
performance/cpu
performance/memory
performance/speed
priority/critical
priority/low
priority/maybe
priority/medium
proposal/rejected
reviewed/confirmed
reviewed/duplicate
reviewed/fixed
reviewed/invalid
reviewed/not-a-bug
reviewed/wontfix
skip-changelog
stale
status/blocked
status/needs-feedback
status/wip
theme/2fa
theme/authentication
theme/avatar
theme/backup-restore
theme/docker
theme/federation
theme/issues
theme/kanban
theme/markdown
theme/migration
theme/mobile
theme/pr
theme/signing
theme/sqlite
theme/timetracker
theme/webhook
theme/wiki
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: lunny/gitea#2343
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "feature-dashboard-filters-custom-search"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Based on #2326 (need to be merged first)
Discussion on #2312
Fast network (no restrictions):
Slow network ("Slow 3G" through Chrome network setting):
Edit: Updated screnshots/gifs.
Could you please run
make generate-swagger
to regenerate the swagger spec? This might resolve the conflict. If not please resolve the conflicts manually.Please add
swagger:parameter
like here:aa6a2c9962/models/repo_list.go (L92)
Do not add swagger stuff manually because it will be overwritten if you run
make generate-swagger
.Never touched this file manually. It was generated by
make generate-swagger
(exactlymingw32-make generate-swagger
).I did. Conflicts are new due to new master. I'll rebase and run it again.
OK
@JonasFranzDEV Please comment first 2 commits in #2326. This PR is based on it (master -> #2326 -> #2343).
Codecov Report
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Rebased on top of #2371 + #2326. Only last commit is new.
PR reopened as all needed features were merged. Rebased on master, ready for testing, review and comments.
@JonasFranzDEV please review again
@lafriks FYI he was actually reviewing another PR code (as this PR was not based on master). That code is not part of this PR anymore.
Changed UI by removing second loader that was causing "flickering" effect if search was fast. Now the repository counter is reset on each filter change. Adding new screenshots (limit set to 5 repositories for this tests).
Edit: Screenshots moved to PR description.
LGTM
LGTM
Make LG-TM work
@JonasFranzDEV I hope you had no requested changes anymore. Just after merging noticed that you have not approved yet